|CASCADE ENERGY & METALS
DR. HAROLD MASUNAGA; YUKIO AYABE; THE ESTATE OF MARIAN HARADA; RESOURCE CONCEPTS, INC.; TELEGRAPH GOLD CORPORATION, as successor in interest to the claim of George Pingree,
JEFFREY G. BANKS; KENNETH CALDWELL; COASTAL COMPUTER INVESTMENTS; ELMER J. DAVIS; ROGER A. MANN; H. E. MOSES; ROBERT A. NICKERSON; PETER P. SAMARIN;
HERBERT W. STOLTENBERG; EDWIN STOLTENBERG; PATRICIA STOLTENBERG; CHRIS WAUGH;
PATRICIA SLATER; ROBERT DOUB; SAM HAMBARIAN; ALYCE HAMBARIAN; LIONEL ASCHER; A. C. MEJEDLY; THE ESTATE OF R. E. DONAHEY; GRACE V. DUNCAN; ELLIOT WEINBERG,
Before SEYMOUR, BRISCOE, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
This court reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same legal standards used by the district court. See Charter Canyon Treatment Ctr. v. Pool Co., 153 F.3d 1132, 1135 (10th Cir. 1998). Summary judgment is appropriate "if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law." Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c). In applying this standard, this court views the facts and reasonable inferences therefrom in a light most favorable to the non-moving party. See Kaul v. Stephan, 83 F.3d 1208, 1212 (10th Cir. 1996).
Because the district court sufficiently set out the undisputed material facts in its order, this court need not repeat those facts here. After conducting a de novo review of the parties' briefs and contentions, the district court order, and the entire record on appeal, this court finds no reversible error. Thus, the order of the United States District Court for the District of Utah granting summary judgment to the judgment creditors is hereby AFFIRMED.
ENTERED FOR THE COURT:
Michael R. Murphy
*. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.