UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

SANTIAGO TAPIA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

KRIS HENIGMAN, NM Department of Corrections Prison Guard,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

JOHN THOMAS, Warden, officially and individually,

Defendant.

No. 97-2049

(D.C. No. CIV-95-1160)

(D. N.M.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before PORFILIO and LUCERO, Circuit Judges, and MARTEN,** District Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Plaintiff-appellant Santiago Tapia, a former state prison inmate, brought this § 1983 action alleging that defendant-appellee Kris Henigman, a correction officer, maliciously beat and kicked him, causing serious and permanent injuries. The jury returned a verdict in favor of defendant. Proceeding pro se on appeal, Tapia seeks a new trial on the grounds that the verdict is attributable to the ineffective assistance of his counsel.

The Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel does not apply to civil cases. See MacCuish v. United States, 844 F.2d 733, 735 (10th Cir. 1988). In civil cases, the "remedy for allegedly incompetent representation is a malpractice suit against [the] trial attorney. Any such incompetence provides no basis for granting . . . a new trial." Id. at 735-36.

Accordingly, the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico is AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

J. Thomas Marten

District Judge