FILED
United States Court of Appeals
Tenth Circuit

DEC 3 1997

PATRICK FISHER
Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

CHARLES ROSS MANGRUM and ALAN MONTIERTH,

	Plaintiffs-Appellants,		
v.	No. 96-4164	
U.S. WEST COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, a Colorado Corporation; COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, a labor organization; COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA DISTRICT 7, an administrative unit of a labor organization; and COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA LOCAL NO. 7704, a unit of a labor organization,

	Defendants-Appellees.	(D.C. No. 95-CV-587)
(UTAH)
(961 F. Supp. 1510)	

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before BALDOCK and BRORBY, Circuit Judges, and BROWN, Senior District Judge.**

	Plaintiffs Charles Mangrum and Alan Montierth brought consolidated actions against Defendants U.S. West Communications and Communications Workers of America, alleging violations of § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act.  Plaintiffs, both union members and employees of U.S. West, claimed that U.S. West breached the collective bargaining agreement and the Union breached its duty of fair representation in a dispute over Plaintiffs “primary reporting place.”  Plaintiffs also claimed intentional infliction of emotional distress.  In a thorough opinion, the district court granted both Defendants summary judgment on all claims.  Mangrum v. U.S. West Communications, Inc., 961 F. Supp. 1510 (D. Utah, 1996).  Plaintiffs appeal.  We review the district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo and apply the same standard as the district court under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c).  Taken v. Oklahoma Corp. Comm’n, 125 F.3d 1366, 1368 (10th Cir. 1997).
	We have reviewed the parties’ briefs, pleadings, affidavits, and the entire record before us.  We believe the district court properly granted summary judgment to Defendants, and affirm substantially for the reasons set forth in its Memorandum Decision and Order Granting Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment.
	AFFIRMED.
							Entered for the Court,
							Bobby R. Baldock
							Circuit Judge