97-2154 -- U.S. v. Turner -- 12/22/1997

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,	No. 97-2154
v.	(D.C. No. CV-96-519 JP/JHG)
THOMAS TURNER,	(D. New Mex.)
Defendant - Appellant.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT^(*)

Before ANDERSON, McKAY, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

After examining Appellant's brief and the appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Appellant claims that his conviction was fundamentally defective because he was allowed to plead guilty to conduct that was not a crime, in violation of his right to due process. Mr. Turner appeals the district court's denial of his Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, and the district court's dismissal of his action.

We grant Appellant's motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of costs or fees, and we grant Appellant a certificate of appealability. We affirm the judgment for the reasons given in the magistrate judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition, as adopted and supplemented by the district court in its Order filed April 1, 1997.

AFFIRMED.

Entered for the Court

Monroe G. McKay

Circuit Judge

FOOTNOTES
Click footnote number to return to corresponding location in the text.

^*. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

(10403 bytes)

(5883 bytes)

Comments to: WebMaster, ca10 [at] washburnlaw.edu.
Updated: December 23, 1997.
HTML markup © 1997, Washburn University School of Law.
URL: http://ca10.washburnlaw.edu/cases/1997/12/97-2154.htm.