97-3197 -- Braun v. Stotts -- 02/04/1998

(10016 bytes)

(7182 bytes)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

CONRAD J. BRAUN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

GARY STOTTS; ROBERT T. STEPHAN; JAMES FRANCISCO; S. D.

WILSON; DONNA K. BRAUN; JOHN DOE, Director of Johnson County Victim Assistance; LYNN STEMM; THOMAS BATH; LEAWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT; WILLIAM COPELAND; E. MICHAEL WARNER; JON S. WILLARD; LINDA COPELAND; VIRGINIA M. HAMMES; (NFN) MAHER, Parole Officer; KRISTI HEIBERT; REX DAVIS; VAN EATON;

CHARLES SIMMONS; LUIS ALONZO; BILL MISKELL; PHIL SWOPES; SHERMAN PARKS; JOAN BENGSTON; MICAH ROSS; KANSAS PAROLE BOARD; (NFN) BROWN, Lt.; ROBERT N. ROBERTS; WILLIAM CUMMINGS; ROBERT HANNIGAN; CHERYL ALLEN; MARK SHERMAN;

TIMOTHY MADDEN; SAM TUCKER; J. STEPHEN COX; JOE LANGER; DAVID RAWLINGS; LINDA L. PARKER; STEPHEN D. HILL; DAN

STEWART; BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE SHAWNEE MISSION SCHOOL,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 97-3197

(D.C. No. 93-3118-GTV)

(District of Kansas)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT^(*)

Before PORFILIO, KELLY, and HENRY, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This is an appeal from the dismissal of a civil rights action. Our examination of the record indicates the action was correctly dismissed. We AFFIRM for the reasons stated in the district court's order of June 19, 1997.

We find this appeal is FRIVOLOUS under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and determine this is a "prior occasion" within the meaning of that section. Appellant must pay all of his outstanding appellate fees after full payment of all fees accessed in the district court.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

John C. Porfilio

Circuit Judge

FOOTNOTES
Click footnote number to return to corresponding location in the text.

^*. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

(10016 bytes)

(7182 bytes)

Comments to: WebMaster, ca10 [at] washburnlaw.edu.
Updated: February 5, 1998.
HTML markup © 1998, Washburn University School of Law.
URL: http://ca10.washburnlaw.edu/cases/1998/02/97-3197.htm.