98-7000 -- Robinson v. Cain -- 04/21/1998

(9076 bytes)

(6297 bytes)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

BETESTIA ROBINSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

JUDY CAIN, The Oklahoma State Employment Commission; KATHY HARRIS, the Department of Human Resource; KARLA TURLEY, Travelers Express Company,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 98-7000

(D.C. No. 97-CV-472-BU)

(Eastern District of Oklahoma)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT^(*)

Before PORFILIO, KELLY, and HENRY, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Betestia Robinson appeals the dismissal on statute of limitations and procedural grounds of her purported civil rights complaint. Our examination of the briefs and the record indicates the district court did not err. The judgment is AFFIRMED for the reasons stated by the district court in its order of dismissal dated December 3, 1997.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

John C. Porfilio

Circuit Judge

FOOTNOTES
Click footnote number to return to corresponding location in the text.

^*. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

(9076 bytes)

(6297 bytes)

Comments to: WebMaster, ca10 [at] washburnlaw.edu.
Updated: April 22, 1998.
HTML markup © 1998, Washburn University School of Law.
URL: http://ca10.washburnlaw.edu/cases/1998/04/98-7000.htm.