| Keyword | Case | Docket | Date: Filed / Added |     (12330 bytes)     (7314 bytes)

Plaintiff filed a pro se action against two IRS employees, two credit union employees, and the attorney who represented the credit union for alleged constitutional and statutory violations arising out of seizure of property pursuant to a tax levy. The district court dismissed the action and granted the attorney's motion for reasonable attorney's fees as a sanction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11. Plaintiff appealed.

After the parties had filed their briefs on appeal, plaintiff filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. We agree that the appeal should be dismissed, as it is "eminently frivolous." Smith v. Kitchen, 156 F.3d 1025, 1027 (10th Cir. 1997). "An appeal is frivolous when the result is obvious, or the appellant's arguments of error are wholly without merit." Braley v. Campbell, 832 F.2d 1504, 1510 (10th Cir. 1987) (quotation omitted) (en banc). After reviewing the record on appeal, the parties' briefs and the relevant case law, we believe that it was absolutely clear at the time plaintiff filed this appeal that it was without merit and that the result on appeal was obvious. Apparently, as represented by his motion to dismiss, plaintiff also recognized that his appellate arguments are completely meritless and that an appeal would be fruitless.

Accordingly, plaintiff's motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

John C. Porfilio

Circuit Judge

^*. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

| Keyword | Case | Docket | Date: Filed / Added |     (12330 bytes)     (7314 bytes)