Slip Opinions Home
Page | Keyword | Case | Docket | Date: Filed / Added |    Download WordPerfect version (10293 bytes)     Download RTF version (7014 bytes)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT


WILLIE RAY LAMPLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

vs.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.



No. 98-7186

(
D.C. No. 98-CV-554-S)

(E.D. Okla.)


ORDER AND JUDGMENT(*)


Before ANDERSON, KELLY, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.(**)


Mr. Lampley, an inmate appearing pro se and in forma pauperis, appeals the district court's dismissal of his federal civil rights lawsuit. The district court dismissed the lawsuit by minute order, finding that Mr. Lampley failed to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a) and (e) and determining that Mr. Lampley's lawsuit was frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); I R., tab 6. We review the district court's dismissal of a complaint as frivolous for abuse of discretion, see McWilliams v. Colorado, 121 F.3d 573, 574-75 (10th Cir. 1997), and liberally construe the pro se complaint, see Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21 (1972). Mr. Lampley's arguments are neither comprehensible nor rational. After carefully reviewing the record, we find that no abuse of discretion has occurred and dismiss Mr. Lampley's appeal.

AFFIRMED.

Entered for the Court

Paul J. Kelly, Jr.

Circuit Judge


FOOTNOTES
Click footnote number to return to corresponding location in the text.

*. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

**. After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1 (G). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.


Slip Opinions Home
Page | Keyword | Case | Docket | Date: Filed / Added |    Download WordPerfect version (10293 bytes)     Download RTF version (7014 bytes)
Comments to: WebMaster, ca10 [at] washburnlaw.edu.
Updated: July 21, 1999.
HTML markup © 1999, Washburn University School of Law.
URL: http://ca10.washburnlaw.edu/cases/1999/07/98-7186.htm.