FILED
United States Court of Appeals
Tenth Circuit

SEP 13 1999

PATRICK FISHER
Clerk

	UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

WILLIAM JAY NICHOLS,

		Plaintiff - Appellant,	

No. 98-6469	
	v.	(W.D. Oklahoma)	
PATRICIA PRESLEY and NILES JACKSON,

		Defendants - Appellees.	(D.C. No. CV-98-404-C)		

	ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before ANDERSON, KELLY, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.

	After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal.  See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G).  The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
	William Jay Nichols, a state prisoner at the Great Plains Correctional Center in Hinton, Oklahoma, appeals the dismissal of his civil rights action, brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against the court clerk for the Oklahoma County District Court and a state court judge.
	In his action, Mr. Nichols claimed his constitutional rights were violated when the court clerk did not provide him with a trial transcript at public expense, and the state judge denied his request for a free transcript.  The magistrate judge recommended that the complaint, barred by judicial immunity and quasi-judicial immunity, be dismissed for failure to state a claim.  After consideration of Mr. Nichols’ objections, the district court adopted the recommendation and dismissed the complaint.  This appeal followed.
	After fully considering Mr. Nichols’ arguments on appeal and the entire file, we conclude that the magistrate judge and the district court correctly analyzed this case in their respective “Findings and Recommendation” filed August 21, 1998, and “Order of Dismissal” filed September 25, 1998, both of which we incorporate by this reference.
	Furthermore, we find that this appeal is frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and, accordingly, dismiss this appeal pursuant to § 1915(e)(2). The district court dismissed the complaint pursuant to this same statutory provision; thus, that dismissal and our dismissal, together, count as two “prior occasions” for purposes of § 1915(g).  See Jennings v. Natrona County Detention Center, 175 F.3d 775 (10th Cir. 1999).
DISMISSED.
	ENTERED FOR THE COURT

	Stephen H. Anderson
	Circuit Judge