FILED
United States Court of Appeals
Tenth Circuit

JUN 2 2000

PATRICK FISHER
Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,
vs.

CARLOS ALBERTO ESTUPINAN,

Defendant - Appellant.	

No. 99-6378
(	D.C. No. 99-CR-15)
(W.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before BRORBY, KELLY, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.**

	Defendant-Appellant Carlos Estupinan appeals from his conviction of conspiracy to distribute cocaine powder, 21 U.S.C. § 846.  He was sentenced to 78 months imprisonment and five years supervised release.  On appeal, he contends that the district court erred in denying his motion for a downward departure on the misapprehension that it lacked the authority to depart under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(b).
	Mr. Estupinan sought a downward departure under § 3553(b) and USSG § 5K2.0 on the grounds that the sentence in this case will have unusually harsh effects on him and his family because of his status a deportable alien.  In response, the trial court determined that the ground urged for departure “just does not qualify under this Court’s understanding of the controlling authorities so as to remove it from the heartland of cases or sufficiently distinguish his case as would be required to grant the defendant’s request . . . .”  Sent. Tr. (Sept. 7, 1999) at 61.  We have reviewed the sentencing transcript, including the authority cited therein, and conclude that, on balance, the trial court was aware of its authority to depart and chose not to exercise it.  Accordingly, we are without jurisdiction to review the district court’s decision not to depart and DISMISS the appeal.  See United States v. Castillo, 140 F.3d 874, 887-888 (10th Cir. 1998).

						Entered for the Court

						Paul J. Kelly, Jr.
						Circuit Judge