UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

EINSTEIN (BOSS MAN), a/k/a

ACCOUNTABILITY BURNS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

TULSA COUNTY ELECTION BOARD,

Defendant-Appellee.	No. 00-5054

(D.C. No. 74-CV-153-E)

(N.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, EBEL, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Einstein (Boss Man) a/k/a Accountability Burns appeals the district court order denying his motions for new trial, retrial and change of venue, and his motion to reinstate the case. The district court denied plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and plaintiff now seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court.

In ruling on plaintiff's motions, the district court reviewed docket entries 24, 25, 26, 27, and 28, and concluded that the motions raised new claims and therefore should have been pursued as new original actions. The record on

appeal consists of material from a case originally filed in 1974 and copies of media articles, many of which are annotated by plaintiff. The record does not, however, contain the docket entries ruled on by the district court. We therefore have nothing to review. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied and the appeal is DISMISSED.1

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Stephanie K. Seymour

Chief Judge