FILED
United States Court of Appeals
Tenth Circuit

JUL 19 2001

PATRICK FISHER
Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,
vs.

MARCOS FELIX-PACHECO,

Defendant - Appellant.	

No. 00-4136
(	D.C. No. 99-CR-256-C)
(D. Utah)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before EBEL, KELLY, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.**

	Defendant-Appellant Marcos Felix-Pacheco pled guilty to one count of knowingly and intentionally distributing 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectible amount of methamphetamine, 21 U.S.C. §§ 21 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), and aiding and abetting, 18 U.S.C. § 2.  I R. doc. 98.  In exchange for the plea, the government agreed, inter alia, not to recommend a sentence longer than the statutory minimum of 120 months.  Id. doc. 84, at 5.  After concluding that the applicable sentencing range was 108 to 135 months, the district court sentenced Mr. Felix-Pacheco to 120 months of imprisonment and five years of supervised release.  II R. at 6.  Mr. Felix-Pacheco appeals from this sentence, asserting that it is “too long” and that he should have been sentenced to 108 months.  Aplt. Br. at 4-5.  Counsel for Mr. Felix-Pacheco has filed an Anders brief, id. at 5; see Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967) (“[I]f counsel finds his case to be wholly frivolous, after a conscientious examination of it, he should so advise the court and request permission to withdraw.”), and concluded “that there are no meritorious grounds for appeal.”  Aplt. Br. at 5.  Counsel has sent a letter to this effect, along with a copy of her brief, to Mr. Felix-Pacheco.  Id.; Motion to Withdraw (filed Dec. 18, 2000).  Counsel now requests that she be allowed to withdraw as counsel for Mr. Felix-Pacheco.  Motion to Withdraw (filed Dec. 18, 2000). 
	We have reviewed the entire record, including the transcript of the sentencing proceedings and presentence report.  Although the district court misstated Mr. Felix-Pacheco’s adjusted offense level, failed to address Mr. Felix-Pacheco’s acceptance of responsibility, and cited the wrong guideline provision in concluding that Mr. Felix-Pacheco qualified for the safety valve, the district court sentenced Mr. Felix-Pacheco within the appropriate guideline range.	These errors do not create an appealable issue--Mr. Felix-Pacheco would have received 151 to 188 months if the district court’s calculation of the offense level was in fact correct.  U.S.S.G. Ch. 5 Pt. A. (1998).  Mr. Felix-Pacheco’s claim that his sentence is too long is therefore “wholly frivolous”  Anders, 386 U.S. at 744, and we DISMISS his appeal as one not contemplated under 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a).  United States v. Neary, 183 F.3d 1196, 1198 (10th Cir. 1999); United States v. Garcia, 919 F.2d 1478, 1482 (10th Cir.1990).  Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.  
						Entered for the Court

						Paul J. Kelly, Jr.
						Circuit Judge