FILED
United States Court of Appeals
Tenth Circuit

FEB 6 2002

PATRICK FISHER
Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

		Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

ARMANDO PADILLA,

		Defendant-Appellant.	

No. 00-5128
(D.C. No. 99-CR-66-C)
(N.D. Okla.)	

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before TACHA, Chief Judge, PORFILIO, Circuit Judge, and BRORBY, Senior Circuit Judge.

	After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously to grant the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral argument.  See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G).  The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
	Appellant Armando Padilla pled guilty to a single count of distribution of an unspecified amount of methamphetamine.  Based on its findings regarding the quantity of drugs involved, the district court sentenced him to over twenty-four years’ imprisonment, in excess of the statutory maximum of twenty years established by 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C).  Mr. Padilla argues on appeal that his sentence violates Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000), which requires that “any fact that increases a penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.”  The government concedes this error and agrees that Mr. Padilla’s sentence should be reversed and the case remanded for resentencing.
	Accordingly, the judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma is REVERSED, and the matter is REMANDED for resentencing.

				Entered for the Court

				Deanell Reece Tacha 
				Chief Judge