This is a pro se state prisoner 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights appeal. Mr.
Brown seeks damages and injunctive relief on his claim that prison officials are
not adequately providing him with medical care. The district court dismissed Mr.
Brown's complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) because
his complaint and amended complaint failed to establish the Defendants' personal
participation in the alleged deprivation of his constitutional rights. The district
court denied Mr. Brown's motion for reconsideration. Mr. Brown appealed to
this court.
Mr. Brown failed to allege the essential element of personal participation
of any of the Defendants as is required in a § 1983 civil rights action. See
Bennett v. Passic, 545 F.2d 1260, 1262-63 (10th Cir. 1976). Therefore, after a
thorough review of the briefs and the record, and for substantially the same
reasons set forth in the district court's well-reasoned October 10, 2001 Order and
Judgment of Dismissal, we hold that no relief is available to Mr. Brown.
Appellant's appeal is DISMISSED.
ENTERED FOR THE COURT
Monroe G. McKay
Circuit Judge
*. This order and judgment is not binding
precedent, except under the
doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court
generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order
and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
JONATHAN CARLOS BROWN,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
JOHN SUTHERS, Executive Director
for the Colorado Department of
Corrections; MR. NEUFELD; MR.
LAWSON; MR. MCGARRY;
Unknown Access Officials; Unknown
Limon Medical Officials; Other
Unknown D.O.C. Officials,
Defendants-Appellees.
Before SEYMOUR and McKAY, Circuit Judges, and
BRORBY, Senior Circuit
Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this panel has
determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the
determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G).
The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Click footnote number to return to corresponding location in the text.
| Keyword |
Case |
Docket |
Date: Filed /
Added |
(11499 bytes)
(7220 bytes)
Comments to: WebMaster,
ca10 [at] washburnlaw.edu.
Updated: February 5, 2002.
HTML markup © 2002, Washburn University School of Law.
URL: http://ca10.washburnlaw.edu/cases/2002/02/01-1505.htm.