FILED
United States Court of Appeals
Tenth Circuit

FEB 7 2002

PATRICK FISHER
Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.

RODNEY ALPHONZE ARCENEAUX,

Defendant - Appellant.	

No. 01-6295
(	D.C. Nos. 01-CV-637-R, 
98-CR-61-R)
(W.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before EBEL, KELLY, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.**

	Rodney Arceneaux, a federal prisoner appearing pro se, seeks a certificate of appealability (“COA”) allowing him to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his habeas petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255.  Mr. Arceneaux has failed to make a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right” as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).  We deny a COA, a jurisdictional prerequisite, 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B), and dismiss the appeal.		
	Mr. Arceneaux pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute cocaine base (“crack”) and aiding and abetting in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2.  He later unsuccessfully sought to withdraw his guilty plea.  Mr. Arceneaux was sentenced to 292 months imprisonment and five years supervised release.  On direct appeal, this court affirmed Mr. Arceneaux’s conviction and sentence.  United States v. Arceneaux, No. 99-6049, 2000 WL 136150 (10th Cir. Jan. 26, 2000).  
	On appeal of the denial of his § 2255 motion, Mr. Arceneaux argues that (1) he has not had a full and fair opportunity for an adjudication of his Fourth Amendment claim, and (2) he was denied his constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel when the district court denied his § 2255 motion without adjudicating the merits.  Aplt. Br. (A-15) at 3.  
	We agree with the district court that Mr. Arceneaux’s Fourth Amendment claim and his ineffective assistance of counsel claim was addressed by this court on direct appeal.  Arceneaux, 2000 WL 136150 at * 2.  We found Mr. Arceneaux had failed to show that his counsel was ineffective and could not raise his Fourth Amendment claim given his valid guilty plea.  Id.  Mr. Arceneaux may not raise issues decided on direct appeal under § 2255.  See United States v. Warner, 23 F.3d 287, 291 (10th Cir. 1994) (citing cases). 
 	We DENY Mr. Arceneaux’s request for a COA and IFP and DISMISS this appeal.  
						Entered for the Court

						Paul J. Kelly, Jr.
						Circuit Judge