FILED
United States Court of Appeals
Tenth Circuit

MAY 8 2002

PATRICK FISHER
Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

GEORGE GREGORY JACKSON,

		Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ANALYST INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION; ANDERSEN CONSULTING; YELLOW TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, INC.; YELLOW LOGISTICS; YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC.; YELLOW CORPORATION,

		Defendants - Appellees.	

No.  01-3151
(D.C. Nos. 96-CV-2055-GTV,
96-CV-2056-GTV, 96-CV-2057-GTV,
97-CV-2274-GTV, 97-CV-2457-GTV)
(D. Kansas)	

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before KELLY, BRISCOE, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

	After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal.  See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G).  The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
	Appellant George Gregory Jackson appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for relief from judgment brought pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b).  We review the denial of a 60(b) motion for abuse of discretion.  Plotner v. AT&T Corp., 224 F.3d 1161, 1174 (10th Cir. 2000).  “We will reverse the district court’s determination only if we find a complete absence of a reasonable basis and are certain that the district court’s decision is wrong.”  Id. (quotation omitted).
	Having carefully reviewed the briefs, the record, and the applicable law, we conclude that Mr. Jackson has failed to demonstrate that the district court abused its discretion in denying his 60(b) motion.  Accordingly, the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Kansas is AFFIRMED.

				Entered for the Court

				Mary Beck Briscoe
				Circuit Judge