FILED
United States Court of Appeals
Tenth Circuit

JUL 10 2002

PATRICK FISHER
Clerk

	UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

CARL DIXON,

Petitioner - Appellant,
v.

RICHARD SOARES and KEN SALAZAR, Attorney General for the State of Colorado,

Respondents - Appellees.	No. 02-1093
(D.C. No. 99-D-528)
(D. Colorado)	

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before EBEL, LUCERO and O’BRIEN, Circuit Judges.

	Carl Dixon appeals pro se from the denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254.  Dixon was convicted in Colorado state court of first degree felony murder and sentenced to life imprisonment.  His § 2254 petition argues five grounds for relief: (1) that he did not voluntarily waive his right to testify; (2) that no probable cause existed for the issuance of a search warrant; (3) that evidence irrelevant to the crime charged erroneously was admitted; (4) that a prior inconsistent statement of a witness erroneously was excluded; and (5) that the evidence was insufficient to convict.
	The magistrate judge recommended denial of the first, third, and fourth claims on the merits, of the second claim as not cognizable in habeas because it was fully litigated in state court, and of the fifth claim as procedurally barred.  After carefully evaluating Dixon’s claims, the district court adopted the magistrate’s recommendation.
	For substantially the reasons given by the district court, we GRANT Dixon’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, DENY a certificate of appealability, and DISMISS the appeal.
	
						ENTERED FOR THE COURT

						David M. Ebel
						Circuit Judge