FILED
United States Court of Appeals
Tenth Circuit

AUG 16 2002

PATRICK FISHER
Clerk

	UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,		
v.	No. 01-4262	
RAMEY CLYDE BARBIERI,

Defendant - Appellant.
	(D.C. No. 2:99-CR-439-W)
(D. Utah)	

	ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before SEYMOUR, HENRY, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.

	After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal.  See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G).  The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
	Appellant Ramey Clyde Barbieri was indicted by a grand jury on one count of transportation of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2.  Prior to trial, he filed a motion to dismiss the indictment, arguing that several provisions of the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 were unconstitutional.  Specifically, he contended that definitional language in 18 U.S.C. § 2256(8)(B) and (D) prohibiting material which “appears to be” or “conveys the impression” of a minor engaged in sexual activity was vague and overbroad.  The district court denied the motion to dismiss.  Barbieri then pled guilty to the indictment but reserved the right to appeal the denial of his motion to dismiss.
	In Free Speech Coalition v. Ashcroft, 122 S. Ct. 1389, 1405-06 (2002), the Court ruled that the disputed definitional language in § 2256(8)(B) and (D) was overbroad and unconstitutional.  As a consequence, we conclude this matter should be remanded to the district court with directions to vacate Barbieri's conviction.
	REMANDED with directions.  The mandate shall issue forthwith.
							Entered for the Court
							Mary Beck Briscoe
							Circuit Judge