FILED
United States Court of Appeals
Tenth Circuit

SEP 26 2002

PATRICK FISHER
Clerk

	UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITES STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.

HAROLD GLEN CLAYTON,

Defendant - Appellant.	
No. 01-7093
(D.C. No. 01-CV-106-P, 98-CR-25-1)
(E.D. Oklahoma)	

ORDER AND JUDGMENT

Before EBEL, KELLY, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

	
	After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously to honor the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral argument.  See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G).  The case is therefore submitted without oral argument.

	Appellant’s Apprendi claims are barred under United States v. Mora, 293 F.3d 1213 (10th Cir. 2002) and procedural bar.  Appellant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims were properly denied because of procedural bar, failure to show either actual conflict of interest or prejudice, and because the claims are conclusory and not supported in the record.
	We have examined all of the claims raised by Appellant on appeal and find that none of them have merit.
	Accordingly, the district court order denying petitioner’s petition for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is AFFIRMED.

						ENTERED FOR THE COURT

						David M. Ebel
						Circuit Judge