UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
(D.C. No. 00-CV-3449-RDR)
(D. Kansas)
This is a pro se 28 U.S.C. § 2241 military-prisoner appeal. Mr. Rogers
was convicted by a general court-martial of rape, robbery, housebreaking,
attempted rape, AWOL, assault, and burglary. He was sentenced to forty years'
confinement and a dishonorable discharge. He was released on parole, but parole
was revoked due to his violation of parole conditions.
In his § 2241 petition, Mr. Rogers challenges the Army Clemency and
Parole Board's revocation of his parole and the denial of street-time credit. The
district court denied the petition holding that the Board adhered to its regulations
and applicable due process principles. This appeal followed.
After a thorough review of the brief and the record, and for substantially
the same reasons set forth in the district court's well-reasoned May 16, 2002,
Order, we hold that no relief is available to Mr. Rogers.
AFFIRMED.
Entered for the Court
Monroe G. McKay
Circuit Judge
*. This order and judgment is not binding
precedent, except under the
doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court
generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order
and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
RICKEY G. ROGERS,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
No. 02-3182
COL. STEPHEN L. ANDRASCHKO,
Respondent-Appellee.
Before KELLY, McKAY, and
MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
After examining the brief and the appellate record, this panel has
determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the
determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G).
The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Click footnote number to return to corresponding location in the text.
| Keyword |
Case |
Docket |
Date: Filed /
Added |
(11391 bytes)
(6248 bytes)
Comments to: WebMaster,
ca10 [at] washburnlaw.edu.
Updated: December 31, 2002.
HTML markup © 2002, Washburn University School of Law.
URL: http://ca10.washburnlaw.edu/cases/2002/12/02-3182.htm.