Slip Opinions Home
Page | Keyword | Case | Docket | Date: Filed / Added |    Download WordPerfect version (10801 bytes)     Download RTF version (6444 bytes)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

ADRIAN VALDEZ-ROCHA,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-2203

(D.C. No. CR-99-1267-JC)

(D. New Mexico)


ORDER AND JUDGMENT(*)


Before SEYMOUR, MURPHY and O'BRIEN, Circuit Judges.


After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Adrian Valdez-Rocha pled guilty to illegal reentry after deportation subsequent to an aggravated felony conviction. He appeals his conviction and sentence of sixty months in prison and three years of supervised release.

Judgment in this case was entered on December 5, 2001. Mr. Valdez-Rocha did not file this notice of appeal until August 1, 2002, seven and a half months late, and six and a half months after any possible extension of time he could have received.(1) Timely notice of appeal is both mandatory and jurisdictional. See United States v. Langham, 77 F.3d 1280, 1280 (10th Cir. 1996). We therefore dismiss his appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Accordingly, we DISMISS the appeal.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Stephanie K. Seymour

Circuit Judge


FOOTNOTES
Click footnote number to return to corresponding location in the text.

*.This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.


1. Mr. Valdez-Rocha filed a motion to modify his sentence, which the district court denied on July 23, 2002. Although the notice of appeal was timely filed from the denial of the motion to modify, Mr. Valdez-Rocha is challenging only his original conviction and sentence.


Slip Opinions Home
Page | Keyword | Case | Docket | Date: Filed / Added |    Download WordPerfect version (10801 bytes)     Download RTF version (6444 bytes)
Comments to: WebMaster, ca10 [at] washburnlaw.edu.
Updated: August 6, 2003.
HTML markup © 2003, Washburn University School of Law.
URL: http://ca10.washburnlaw.edu/cases/2003/08/02-2203.htm.