FILED
United States Court of Appeals
Tenth Circuit

JUN 16 2004

PATRICK FISHER
Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

LAWRENCE L. KELLY,

	Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

	Defendants-Appellees.	No. 03-3371
(D.C. No. 03-CV-4137-JAR)
(Kansas)	

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before SEYMOUR, LUCERO, and O’BRIEN, Circuit Judges.

	Lawrence Kelly filed suit pro se against the United States Department of Justice in Kansas federal district court.  He captioned his initial pleading “unconstitutionality” and referenced 18 U.S.C. §§ 241 and 245 and 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1982.  Rec. 10 at 1.  The district court granted the Justice Department’s motion to dismiss, id. at 3, and we affirm.
	The Justice Department is undeniably an arm of the United States Government.  For a suit against the United States to be viable, “[a] waiver of the Federal Government’s sovereign immunity must be unequivocally expressed in statutory text.”  Lane v. Pena, 518 U.S. 187, 192 (1996).  We must strictly construe any waiver of sovereign immunity, and where one is not explicit, it cannot be implied.  Id.  None of the statutes Mr. Kelly cites effect a waiver of the United States’ sovereign immunity by providing that an action may be brought directly against the United States.  As such, “the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to consider the claim.”  Steele v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 355 F.3d 1204, 1213 (10th Cir. 2003).
	Because we conclude the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, we need not review that court’s alternative dismissal for failure to state a claim.  The district court’s dismissal of Mr. Kelly’s complaint is AFFIRMED.
						ENTERED FOR THE COURT

						Stephanie K. Seymour
						Circuit Judge