FILED
United States Court of Appeals
Tenth Circuit

JAN 26 2005

PATRICK FISHER
Clerk

	UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

LEONARD BALDAUF,

		Plaintiff - Appellant,

	v.

JOHN HYATT; ROBERT FAHEY, Lieutenant, Fremont Corr. Facility; GARY NEET, Warden; GLORIA MASTERSON; CHARLES TAPPE, Hearing Officer; RICHARD MARTINEZ, Hearing Officer; BETTY FULTON, Case Manager; DAVID ROBERTS, Case Manager; PAUL CARRERAS, Lieutenant; WILLIAM ZALMAN, Director of Offender Services; CONNIE DAVIS, Sergeant; PATRICIA ROMERO, Mental Health Case Worker; KEN MAESTAS, Lieutenant; SGT. GARCIA; LIEUTENANT CARR; DAVID ARCHULETA, Sergeant; CHAD NELSON, Officer; UNKNOWN PROPERTY OFFICER; NARD CLAAR, Asst. Warden; MAJOR HARLAN,

		Defendants - Appellees.	

No. 03-1191
(D. Colorado)
(D.C. No. 01-RB-1315 (CBS))		

	ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before TACHA, Chief Judge, HENRY, and HARTZ, Circuit Judges.

	As the parties agree, the threshold issue before us is whether the Heck doctrine, see Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), bars jurisdiction in this case.  Whether Heck applies depends on whether deprivation of good-time or earned-time credits necessarily affects the duration of a Colorado prisoner’s confinement.  The record is inadequate to resolve this matter, and both counsel at oral argument sought remand to the district court for development of the record.  Accordingly, we REMAND to the district court for further proceedings concerning whether, under the Heck doctrine, the district court has jurisdiction to hear Mr. Baldauf’s claims.  If the court determines that it has jurisdiction, it should decide the merits, conducting any further proceedings that it deems necessary.  
						ENTERED FOR THE COURT

						Harris L Hartz
						Circuit Judge