The parties are familiar with the facts, and we need not restate them here. Having reviewed the matter de novo and for substantially the same reasons iterated in the district court's order dismissing Mr. Davis's suit, we AFFIRM. Mr. Davis has clearly failed to demonstrate the exhaustion of administrative remedies mandated by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) or complete exhaustion where he did file a grievance. See Jernigan v. Stuchell, 304 F.3d 1030, 1032 (10th Cir. 2002) (requiring complete exhaustion).
Entered for the Court
Paul J. Kelly, Jr.
*. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
**. After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.