FILED
United States Court of Appeals
Tenth Circuit

MAY 11 2005

PATRICK FISHER
Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

CARL DEAN WYATT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

vs.

GARY E. GIBSON; JEFF ODOM, Correctional Officer; K. SUDDUTH, Correctional Officer; JOHN DOE, Correctional Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.	

No. 04-7088
(	D.C. No. CV-02-539-S)
(E.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before KELLY, O’BRIEN, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges.**

	Carl Dean Wyatt, a state inmate appearing pro se, appeals from the district court’s dismissal of Defendant Michael Sudduth and grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant Jeff Odom.  Defendant Gary Gibson was granted summary judgment on the basis of no personal participation.  R. Doc. 86.  Other Defendants were dismissed.  R. Doc. 53 (Defendant Koplidansky dismissed by Plaintiff’s agreement); Doc. 97 (Defendant Clarkson dismissed for lack of service).
	The parties are familiar with the fact and we need not restate them here.  The district court properly concluded that the claim of negligence against Defendant Sudduth (for failing to detect weapons carried into the exercise yard by other inmates and used to maim Mr. Wyatt) was not actionable.  Deliberate indifference, not negligence or even gross negligence, regarding a substantial risk of serious harm must be alleged in a failure to protect claim.  See Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 842-83 (1994) (failure to protect); Harper v. Alpert, 400 F.3d 1052, 1064 (7th Cir. 2005) (excessive force).  We have reviewed the summary judgment record insofar as Defendant Jeff Odom, taking Mr. Wyatt’s allegations in his verified pleadings as true, and conclude that the district court’s disposition was correct.  Although Mr. Wyatt has added additional theories on how weapons were smuggled into the yard (and the extent of the problem), we agree with the district court that these unsworn allegations do not furnish an evidentiary basis for resisting summary judgment.  Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986).  Thus, we affirm for substantially the reasons given by the district court in its orders.  R. Docs. 98 & 99.  
	AFFIRMED.  Mr. Wyatt is reminded of his obligation to continue making partial payments until the entire balance of the appellate filing fee is paid. 
						Entered for the Court

						Paul J. Kelly, Jr.
						Circuit Judge