FILED
United States Court of Appeals
Tenth Circuit

June 28, 2005

PATRICK FISHER
Clerk

	UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

KENNETH HARTFIELD,

Petitioner-Appellant,
v.

CHARLES SIMMONS; PHIL KLINE,

Respondents-Appellees.	No. 04-3352
(D.C. No. 03-CV-3191-JTM)
(D. Kan.)	

ORDER

Before EBEL, McKAY and HENRY, Circuit Judges.

	Petitioner‑Appellant Kenneth Hartfield appeals the district court’s decision denying him habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2254, from his Kansas convictions for aggravated kidnapping, aggravated criminal sodomy and rape.  On appeal, Hartfield argues that 1) there was insufficient evidence to support any of his convictions; 2) his attorney provided ineffective representation;
 and 3) the trial judge failed to hold a hearing to determine whether Hartfield’s seven‑year‑old daughter’s testimony was in accord with Kan. Stat. Ann. § 60‑460(dd).  
	To pursue this appeal, Hartfield must first obtain a certificate of appealability (COA).  See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A).  To be entitled to a COA, Hartfield must make a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”  Id. § 2253(c)(2).  And to make this showing, he must establish that “reasonable jurists could debate whether (or for that matter, agree that) the petition should have been resolved [by the district court] in a different manner or that the issues presented were adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.”  Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 483‑84 (2000) (quotations omitted).  After carefully considering Hartfield’s arguments and the entire record, we conclude Hartfield has failed to make a sufficient showing that he is entitled to COA on any of his claims.  Therefore, we DISMISS this appeal. 

						ENTERED FOR THE COURT

						David M. Ebel
						Circuit Judge