| Keyword |
Case |
Docket |
Date: Filed /
Added |
(12723 bytes)
(6888 bytes)
UNITED
STATES COURT OF APPEALS
TENTH CIRCUIT
| GERALD G. COTTON,
Plaintiff-Appellant, |
No. 05-2254
|
| v. |
(D. of N.M.)
|
| RICK LOONEY, Warden, LINDA
LYON, Unit Manager, A.
JARAMILLO, Sergeant, S. COOK,
Case Manager, CORRAL, Unit
Manager, and S. BACA, Case
Manager,
Defendants-Appellees. |
(D.C. No. CIV 05-183 JB/LCS)
|
ORDER AND JUDGMENT(*)
Before KELLY, O'BRIEN, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit
Judges.(2)
Plaintiff-Appellant Gerald G. Cotton, a state prisoner appearing pro se,
filed a civil rights complaint in the district court pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983,
alleging he was repeatedly denied access to the prison law library. The district
court, in an order entered July 28, 2005, denied Mr. Cotton's claim for failure to
meet the requirements of 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). According to the district court,
Cotton failed to exhaust fully his administrative remedies, as required by the
Prison Litigation Reform Act. See Ross v. County of Bernalillo, 365 F.3d 1181,
1190 (10th Cir. 2004) ("[T]he PLRA . . . requires inmates to exhaust fully all of
their claims before filing in federal court."). The court therefore dismissed the
complaint without prejudice.
We agree. For the reasons set forth by the district court, we DISMISS the
appeal. We further remind Mr. Cotton that he remains obligated to continue
making monthly payments to pay the appellate filing fee.
Entered for the court
Timothy M. Tymkovich
Circuit Judge
FOOTNOTES
Click footnote number to return to corresponding location in the text.
*. This order is not binding precedent, except
under the doctrines of law of
the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the
citation of orders; nevertheless, an order may be cited under the terms and
conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
2. After examining the briefs and the appellate
record, this three-judge
panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material
assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th
Cir. R. 34.1(G). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
| Keyword |
Case |
Docket |
Date: Filed /
Added |
(12723 bytes)
(6888 bytes)
Comments to: WebMaster,
ca10 [at] washburnlaw.edu.
Updated: December 15, 2005.
HTML markup © 2005, Washburn University School of Law.
URL: http://ca10.washburnlaw.edu/cases/2005/12/05-2254.htm.