FILED
United States Court of Appeals
Tenth Circuit

May 16, 2006

Elisabeth A. Shumaker
Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

CHIN THI LE; ANH “TONY” DANG

	Plaintiffs‑Appellants,

v.

HY‑VEE, INC.

	Defendant‑Appellee.	

No.  05-3226
(D.C. No. 04-CV-2037-CM)
(D. Kan.)	

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before KELLY, BRISCOE, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

	Chin Thi Le and Anh “Tony” Dang appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Hy-Vee, Inc., on their claim that Hy-Vee denied them service in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981.  Specifically, plaintiffs assert the district court (1) ignored direct evidence of discrimination, (2) erroneously found plaintiffs’ evidence of pretext insufficient to rebut defendant’s alleged legitimate nondiscriminatory explanation for its actions, and (3) failed to apply the summary judgment standard.
	Our jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.  We review de novo the district court’s grant of summary judgment, applying the same standard as that court under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c).  Simms v. Okla. ex rel. Dep't of Mental Health & Substance Abuse Servs., 165 F.3d 1321, 1326 (10th Cir. 1999).
	The district court provided a detailed summary of the facts; we need not restate those facts here.  Having reviewed the briefs, the record, and the applicable law, we hold that plaintiffs have not identified any reversible error in this case.  We therefore AFFIRM the judgment of the district court for substantially the same reasons stated in its memorandum and order, Le v. Hy‑Vee, Inc., 385 F.Supp.2d 1111 (D. Kan. 2005).

				Entered for the Court

				Carlos F. Lucero
				Circuit Judge