FILED
United States Court of Appeals
Tenth Circuit

September 25, 2006

Elisabeth A. Shumaker
Clerk of Court

	UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

		Plaintiff-Appellee,	

No. 06-3077	
	v.	District of Kansas	
GEORGE CURTIS GORE,

		Defendant-Appellant.	(D.C. No. 01-CR-10020-WEB)		

	ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before MURPHY, SEYMOUR, and McCONNELL, Circuit Judges.

	George Curtis Gore appeals from the district court’s order revoking his supervised release and imposing a 10-month term of imprisonment.  At the district court hearing, Mr. Gore admitted to violating the terms of his supervised release by failing on several occasions to participate in a drug treatment program and by failing to abstain from alcohol on one occasion.  He has not retracted that admission or introduced any new evidence.  
	In accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Mr. Gore’s counsel has filed a Motion to Withdraw as Counsel and a brief stating that there are no grounds for appeal.  In counsel’s brief, he states that Mr. Gore does not meet any of the criteria for review under 18 U.S.C. § 3742.  Mr. Gore has not filed a brief indicating disagreement with his counsel’s position.  Our independent review of the record reveals no grounds for relief under § 3742.  Therefore, attorney Jon S. Womack’s motion to withdraw as counsel for Appellant is GRANTED, and the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Kansas is AFFIRMED.		
							Entered for the Court, 
							Michael W. McConnell
							Circuit Judge