FILED
United States Court of Appeals
Tenth Circuit

April 10, 2007

Elisabeth A. Shumaker
Clerk of Court

	UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

		Plaintiff-Appellee,	

No. 06-2132	
	v.	District of New Mexico	
CARMELO CALLEJAS,

		Defendant-Appellant.	(D.C. No. CR-00-732 BB)		

	ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before BRISCOE, McKAY, and McCONNELL, Circuit Judges.

	A jury convicted Carmelo Callejas in 2001 on five counts of criminal conduct.  He was sentenced to 248 months in prison.  This Court has twice affirmed that sentence—once on direct appeal, United States v. Callejas, 66 Fed. App’x 826 (10th Cir. 2003) (unpublished), and again in dismissing Mr. Callejas’s application for a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C.   2255, United States v. Callejas, 137 Fed. App’x 175 (10th Cir. 2005) (unpublished).  Following the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), Mr. Callejas brought a third challenge to his sentence, which he styled as a “Motion to Eliminate Enhancements and Reduce Sentence.”  The district court dismissed his motion, holding that Mr. Callejas could collaterally challenge his sentence only via   2255. Mem. & Order, 1-3.   
	The district court is correct.  Section 2255 provides the exclusive means for collateral attack of a federal criminal sentence.  Baker v. Sheriff of Santa Fe County, 477 F.2d 118, 119 (10th Cir. 1973).  We note, however, that even were Mr. Callejas to petition this Court to authorize a second   2255 application, as required by 28 U.S.C.   2244(3), his petition would fail.  Defendants may not raise a Booker claim in a second or successive   2255 motion, as Booker did not announce a new, retroactive rule of constitutional law.  Bey v. United States, 399 F.3d 1266, 1268-69 (10th Cir. 2005).  
	The judgment of the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico is AFFIRMED.  The government’s motion to dismiss is DENIED.
							Entered for the Court, 
							Michael W. McConnell
							Circuit Judge